No, it wasn't an illusion. The project is being carried out well and truly by the European company Astrium, the space subsidiary of EADS (the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company). Click the banner to find out a little bit more about this company.The TV reportage evoked a question that springs into everybody's mind. Would it be catastrophic if the laser beam were to be slightly displaced so that, instead of reaching its correct target on the ground, it hit a house or a school. Would it fry everything in a split second? Apparently not. The fellow being interviewed treated this as a silly question. The future system will be as harmless as a phone connection, in spite of the fact that it's channeling the energy of the Sun.
In any case, even if it's too early to obtain a significant quantity of serious information concerning this project, it's not too early to meditate upon the idea of a potentially unlimited source of perfectly clean energy. Or am I still dreaming?
POST SCRIPTUM: Although it's not directly related to what I've just been talking about, you might like to listen to Bill Gates presenting his thoughts on energy. Personally, I prefer to hear him rambling on in this field rather than evoking his ugly software products...
Good that you wrote about that "silly" question! I might have had nightmares otherwise, about that beam going just slightly off course. *giggles*
ReplyDeleteI just do believe this. You have a flag counter on your Blog. Oh William! You are so..so.. bourgeois! I am shattered!
ReplyDeleteWilliam's got flag!!
ReplyDeleteMy flag counter has been there for almost five months. In an article of 2 October 2009 entitled Obnoxious Jap, I mentioned that I was getting porn spam from a fellow who used Chinese characters. I said that a Blogger wizard named Chuck had told me how to combat such spam. Later, this same Chuck advised me, once again with the general aim of identifying obnoxious visitors, to install the two site meters and a flag counter. Since then, on two separate occasions, I have referred explicitly to the existence of my flag counter: first, in an article of 17 December 2009 entitled Flag counter, then in an article of 4 January 2010 entitled Flag century. So, the presence of this lightweight flag counter in the Antipodes context is not exactly big breaking news, and it has no bearing upon my attitude concerning the presence of a real-time visitor-identification device in the Tasmanian frog-pond blog. So, let's drop this boring subject, please.
ReplyDelete